These are all of the Housing bills proposed in the 2020 session. Each bill has its own bill number, please use your browser search feature to find the bill you are interested in. Return to the Colorado home page to pick a different bill category.
None of the text is the opinion of Engage. Each bill's description, arguments for, and arguments against are our best effort at describing what each bill does, arguments for, and arguments against the bill. The long description is hidden by design, you can click on it to expand it if you want to read more detail about the bill. If you believe we are missing something, please contact us with your suggestion. Some of these bills have the notation that they have been sent to the chamber's "kill" committee. This means that the leadership has decided to send the bill to the State committee even though it does not belong there based on its subject matter. This committee, in both chambers, is stacked with members from "safe" districts and the idea is to kill the bill without forcing any less safe members to take a hard vote. It is possible for a bill to survive the kill committee, but it is very rare.
Prime sponsors are given after each bill, with Senate sponsors in () and House sponsors in . They are color-coded by party.
Some bills will have text highlighted in pink or highlighted in orange or highlighted in yellow. Pink highlights mean House amendments to the original bill; orange mean Senate amendments; yellow highlights mean conference committee amendments. The bill will say under the header if it has been amended.
Each bill has been given a "magnitude" category: Mega, Major, Medium, Minor, and Technical. This is a combination of the change the bill would create and the "controversy" level of the bill. Some minor bills that are extending current programs would be major changes if they were introducing something new, but the entire goal here is to allow you to better curate your time. Something uncontroversial likely to pass nearly unanimously that continues a past program may not be worth your time (and please remember, you can still read all of the minor bills!). Technical bills are here to round out the list. They are non-substantive changes.
Click on the Senate bill title to jump to its section:
HB20-1009 Suppressing Court Records Of Eviction Proceedings (Winter (D)) [Jackson (D)]
Fiscal Impact: None
Goal: Keep mobile home park eviction or termination actions suppressed unless the plaintiff wins.
Requires the court to suppress court records related to an eviction proceeding or action for termination of a mobile park tenancy so they are not publicly available. If the plaintiff wins, the court must lift the suppression order unless both parties agree they should remain suppressed.
Additional Information: n/a
Landlords often use private screening companies to collect background information on potential tenants and these companies often look for criminal and civil case information. People who have had proceedings begin against them but won should not have to worry that future landlords are going to hold this against them.
This is a good idea but we shouldn’t leave out tenants in rental properties. The rationale behind protecting them is the same.
While we do live in an innocent before proven guilty society, we do not suppress court proceedings involving adults. The public has a vested interest in having this information available publicly, sometimes in order to ferret out abuses by people bringing charges or proceedings. The logic that is being applied here, that just being having proceedings initiated against you can bias people against you, applies to all sorts of judicial proceedings. But we rightly don’t shut out the public on those and shouldn’t here as well.